Who is paul krugmans wife

The fact is that the occupant of the White House betrayed his country. Someone is listening! Krugman has been in the spotlight often over the years, and his wife Robin Wells appears to have been a driving force in putting him there. She has admitted in past interviews that she has encouraged Krugman to use more aggressive language in his writings, especially when discussing politics.

Brown ThomasEBrown3 February 22, She then focused on international finance and debt crisis for her Ph. Wells has also taught at multiple universities over the course of her economics career. In an interview with PBS, Wells talked a little bit about her family. But she added that Krugman has needed less encouragement on that front as he became more comfortable mixing economics and politics.

This motivation was explained in an in-depth New Yorker magaine profile on the couple in The reporter included an example of an article Krugman was writing for Rolling Stone at the time. The topic was the financial crisis and how President Obama was trying to navigate it.

Robin Wells is likely enjoying the current political conversation happening among Democrats about the future of health care. Democratic candidates for president have been debating a single-payer system and a public option that would enable any American to enroll in Medicare. Married Biography. Updated On September 18, I don't think I've had any great success in predicting politics or social change, nor have I really tried.

The real danger with debt is what happens if lots of people decide, or are forced, to pay it off at the same time.

He does not have any kids as of now. Paul Krugman is not having an affair with anyone presently. His sexual orientation is straight. More about the relationship Heading towards the personal life of Paul Krugman, he is a married man. View Todays Anniversary. View Tomorrows Anniversary. Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Inside Biography 1 Who is Paul Krugman?

Cecilia Rouse. Tags : American economist. The world in recent era has not seen an economist like Paul Krugman. Click to know about the legend! Does Kevin Ashman have any secretive girlfriend?

In Relation. Croix, Krugman and Wells live in a large house on a quiet country road in Princeton with their two cats, Doris Lessing and Albert Einstein.

They built the house a few years ago, in a kind of Japanese modern style, with pale wood and horizontal lines and few walls. Next to the living-room area, there is a large empty space where Wells teaches yoga. On Saturday mornings, she teaches a class for, Krugman says, alter kakers old farts , which he attends; he avoids the classes for somewhat younger and mostly female people that she teaches during the week.

In the front of the house is an orderly garden, and in the back the land slopes downhill toward a stream and woods.

On the wall over his desk, he has hung a few framed photographs: F. Krugman and Wells moved to Princeton from M. Wells grew up in Dallas. She is African-American, and her older sister went to a segregated school; Wells, who was born in , did not, but her school was bad enough so that college at the University of Chicago was a shock.

But he travels constantly, speaking at conferences, speaking for pay, promoting his books. Years ago, when he was just an economist, he did a lot of speaking at corporate events. And then, at dinner, they did have a magician! Years of experiments have failed to yield a satisfactory solution.

Krugman has discovered that it is slow and quite risky to use a hair dryer with any item that involves elastic. Long ago, in Tel Aviv, his roommates found him attempting to dry his underwear in a frying pan. Krugman is not a keen traveller. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, many of his contemporaries set off for Eastern Europe—every economist wanted his own personal country to transition. Jeffrey Sachs, in particular, was all over the place, but Krugman was never tempted.

But I do write faster than anybody. Larry maybe has his shirttails hanging out, but he gets stuff done in an orderly fashion. Unlike most well-known academics, Krugman has never had many graduate students.

He is unsure why this is so. Is it that his style of thinking, intuitive rather than methodological, is too difficult to imitate? Is he too distracted? Too busy? Too short? Whatever the reason, it has become clear that his legacy will not be perpetuated in the usual way by a diaspora of little Krugmans, so, if his name is to survive, it is up to him. His papers and books, of course, are the main thing, but in recent years Krugman has also spent a great deal of time distilling his views into an undergraduate textbook.

When he first signed the contract to write it, in , he did it mostly for the money. Then he did no work on it for years. Finally, his publisher told him that he had to get moving, that he should work with a co-author who was better organized and more highly motivated than he was, and suggested his wife. It took them five years of intense work to write the first edition. But a textbook has to be perfect. Even though they were doing it mostly for the money, they knew that, for the students who read it, their textbook might be the only time in their lives that they were exposed to proper economic thinking, which of course would have an influence on their political thinking.

We were working frantically. When they wrote the first edition, they divided the labor according to their specialties, Krugman writing all the macro chapters, Wells writing some of the micro material. You have to be tolerant of a lot more ambiguity in macro than in micro. Freshwater economists—who live near lakes, particularly at the University of Chicago, but also in Rochester and Minneapolis—are more likely to insist that macroeconomics be based on microeconomic foundations, which is to say that one should study large phenomena like recessions and inflation as functions of the behavior of many perfectly rational individuals.

Saltwater economists—who are to be found in coastal areas, especially at M. After all, while there is only one way to be perfectly rational, there are an infinite number of ways to be irrational, and how do you choose? It all begins to look awfully arbitrary.

He accused his colleagues of mistaking beauty for truth. Freshwater types, in particular, had forgotten the Depression, forgotten what Keynes had said about the resemblance of financial markets to casinos.

But even saltwater models had no room for such wild imperfections as bubbles and banking-system collapse. Reactions to his article were quick and outraged. It makes me feel physically ill that a distinguished economist could be so ignorant of his own profession. Find some embarrassing quote from an old interview.

Well, good luck, Paul. If professional economists failed to predict or understand the crisis, how could it make sense for Krugman to argue that bureaucrats would do a good job of curing it?

Krugman was bemused by the reactions. True, he had accused Chicago economists of espousing ridiculous ideas in part because of financial incentives—sabbaticals at the Hoover Institution, job opportunities on Wall Street. But when those economists responded with anger he was surprised. It was always at the level of ideas. Insults may have done some damage to his career over the years. He was thinking about writing his column the next day about the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

He had read an account of the congressional hearings in the newspaper which quoted Jamie Dimon, the C. Dimon had commented that financial crises were just things that happened every few years; Blankfein had compared the crisis to an act of God, like a hurricane.

There was a callousness coming through, he felt. It was probably just a bit of Kabuki that would end in not much. Why was it so politically difficult to reregulate the banks? What good had Wall Street ever done for America? But it turns out that, just when you need it most, that liquidity froze.

Krugman and Wells pulled out of the stock market ten years ago and never went back. The thing is, if you look at it on a historical basis, even back in the two-thousands, stocks are not cheap. Stocks used to be undervalued. But, after the column, then what? Could he, still?